Internet a Front Line in Terror War

Experts are voicing concerns that extremist messages on the web may contribute to radicalization, even among residents of the United States.

"We couldn't put our finger on one thing -- whether it was mostly online sites or video," Chris Heffelfinger, an analyst for the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, told Cybercast News Service. "The threat is that the idea is so popular. Their goal is nationalism, but it's a virtual nation, and 80 to 90 percent of their propaganda is all virtual. Much of it didn't exist before the late 1990s, when they came online."

Someone must be reading the Huffington Post.

CNSnews: Internet a Front Line in Terror War

Peter Mehlman, Proud Member of the Nazi Party

Peter Mehlman is perfect for the Huffington Post. He really is. While most of the crew there is expressing their hatred of the Bush administration for preventing the terrorist attacks on JFK airport, Peter is telling us that Hitler meant well when he murdered 6 million Jews.

"You could argue that even the world's worst fascist dictators at least meant well. They honestly thought were doing good things for their countries by suppressing blacks/eliminating Jews/eradicating free enterprise/repressing individual thought/killing off rivals/invading neighbors, etc." (From Peter Mehlman's Nazi propaganda piece.)

That is a quote from his recent article in which he pulls a Kanye West and tells us that George Bush has not done one thing in 6 years to help the country. "What no one is saying is the one overarching reason he's the worst: the Bush administration is the first that doesn't even mean well," proclaims the Nazi.

According to this Nazi, George Bush did not mean well when he pushed for changes to the tax code which prevent millions of the nation’s poorest families from paying federal taxes. He did not mean well when he asked for standards that held schools accountable for teaching children. He did not mean well when he pushed for changes that helped millions of small business owners find new tax exemptions so that they could hire more employees. He did not mean well when he removed two terrorist regimes from power.

No, he did not mean well, not according to Peter Mehlman. But Mehlman believes that Hitler meant well when he shoved 6 million Jews into gas chambers. Saddam Hussein meant well when he stuffed fathers, mothers and children into meat grinders. Uday Hussein meant well when he would rape young girls and then have his body guards kill them. This is what Peter Mehlman believes

Peter has shown us a new side of himself. He has shown us that he is a Jew hating Nazi. He has shown us that he hates black and believes they should be enslaved. He has shown us that he believes in the assassination of political enemies. He has shown us that he believes all of these things are fine, and that fighting to free people is evil.

Peter Mehlman is a Nazi.

This article is set up for "google bombs" which basically means that keywords are hyperlinked to specific web pages. In this case, the word Nazi is linked to Peter's bio at the Huffington Post. If this were repeated at enough sites and blogs, then a google search for the word Nazi could lead to his bio.

On that note, if you happen to be opposed to the attempt by Hitler to exterminate the Jews and you feel that Mehlman's views should be opposed, please post this article, including the hyperlinks, onto your blog or website. Just make sure that you credit this site and link back to the permalink. Thanks.

Related articles by others:
HuffPo Writer: At Least Hitler Meant Well
The New Left: "Bring Back Hitler"
LFG
Conservative Thoughts

George Bush: 'Worse Than Fascist Dictators'

Related articles by me:
Huffington Post Continues its Support for Terrorists
More on the Stupidity of the Left on the JFK Airport Plot
They Never Rest; More Crazy Propaganda from the Huffington Post
More on the Huffington Post's Al-Qaeda Connection

More on the Stupidity of the Left on the JFK Airport Plot

Planck's Constant has a good one, All Terror Plots Must Fail.

The FBI is making a big mistake: they have to let terrorists succeed now and again.

Anthony Kaufman, the very definition of useful idiot, gave his view on the NYC Terror Plot

They Never Rest; More Crazy Propaganda from the Huffington Post

by The New Pundit

I should go to that site to get all of my material. It has been less than a week since I discussed the propaganda that was written about the JFK plot. Well, not only is there more of it straight from the Huff herself, but there are no less than two articles in support of Saddam Hussein. Yes, I said Saddam Hussein. It seems that they are not aware of the fact that the man is dead. Two articles at the Post are making a bad attempt at smearing Mitt Romney, while showing support for the former terrorist regime of Hussein. They are in addition to an article from Arianna explaining to us that the JFK plotters were not an actual threat because they did not have the financing or the weapons. Arianna, they didn't get the financing or the weapons because they were arrested before they could get these things accomplished. Just so you know, it is a bit more difficult to get this accomplished because of the fact that the NSA intercepts telephone communications from known terrorist organizations overseas. And their plan to blow up the pipeline could have been greatly improved upon once they made contact with monetary resources. While searching for the resources, they could have easily run across people who would have had more knowledge on the science needed to take out the entire pipeline. But we don’t expect someone like yourself to actually thank the authorities for preventing this disaster.

But I made enough mention of the JFK plot in another post. Today I want to talk about the Saddam supporters. Apparently Mitt made some crazy remark about Saddam kicking out UN weapons inspectors, and that it was this action that led to the war. Now I know what you are thinking, you are thinking that Saddam did in fact kick weapons inspectors out of Iraq multiple times from 1997 to 2002. Well, according to Larry Beinhart and Paul Begaga, you are absolutely wrong. You are living in a mad, mad world and stepping in shit.

Now I'm sure that if they were called out, they would try to clarify by stating that they were mostly referring to the fact that Saddam did in fact let inspectors back into the country in 2002. But they would need a lot of clarification because they both intentionally try to get around exactly what happened. They fail to mention how many times in 2002 Iraq rejected UN resolutions regarding inspections. They fail to mention how the inspectors were treated when they were allowed into the country. They fail to mention that Saddam and his thugs did everything possible to keep the inspectors at bay. They pay no attention to the timeline leading up to the liberation of Iraq from a terrorist regime led by Saddam and his two child raping brats. Well, ok, only one of his brats was constantly raping children.

In March 2002, Iraqi officials met with UN officials for the first time since 1998. This is done only after President Bush talks about Iraq in his 2002 SOTU address. UN officials fail to win the return of inspectors at this meeting or the two meeting that occur in May and July. It is not until September of 2002 that Saddam sends a letter to the UN allowing inspections, and even then he does not agree to the rules until October.

In January 2003 Hans Blix filed an update with the UN. In it he describes a lack of cooperation from the Iraqi government that includes actual harassment of the inspectors by Iraqi government officials. He mentions that he is not being given access to interview 3,100 different scientists to fill in gaps from missing records. He mentions the fact that numerous weapons and chemical agents remain unaccounted for. This list includes 1,000 tons of chemical agents from the Iraq-Iran war, 6,500 chemical rockets, 8,500 liters of anthrax, and 650kg of bacterial growth. He finds that Iraq possesses thiodiglycol, a precursor of mustard gas. Iraq had been developing missiles that went beyond the range allowed by sanctions. And to finish things off, they found that 380 rocket engines were smuggled into Iraq the previous month with chemicals used for missile propellants and control systems. This means that as late as December 2002, Iraq was creating and smuggling the very weapons they were not allowed to possess. For those keeping score, this is in fact the part of the justification for the war.

There is something here that is very important, and I don’t want anyone to miss it. Bush stepped up pressure on Iraq in January of 2002. This was after many years of a massive run-around effort by Iraq. Iraq finally decides to 'comply' with the UN in September 2002, and even then still has to be forced to give the small amount of cooperation that it gave. Iraq only makes this announcement after meeting with UN officials in March, May and July. Iraq is aware by this time that Bush is not going to tolerate further noncompliance after 9-11. Iraq knows that Bush is going to attack. Yet with this knowledge, they still drag their feet. What happened in those months?

According to former Iraqi General Georges Sada, Saddam had refitted commercial jets transport WMDs from Iraq to Syria in June 2002. These jets were pretending to fly aid to Syrian flood victims. Let me make sure this is loud and clear. Iraq sent aid to Syria. Iraq had been in a humanitarian crisis since the invasion of Kuwait. UN sanctions prevented other countries from providing food and medicine to the poor. I'm sure you all remember the big stink that was made for so many years about how the evil U.S. was killing Iraqi children by not allowing this food and medicine. But Iraq somehow has the ability to send aid to Syria? This flood killed about 20 people and took out a small amount of farmland. Saddam, being the humanitarian we all know, sent aid to this country despite the fact that he could not take care of his own people. Yeah, I buy that. The general talks about this in his book Saddam's Secrets.
The reason Saddam had kicked out inspectors so many times over the years was because he was in fact trying to re-arm his country. Inspectors had a 4 year long absence from 1998 to 2002 which allowed Saddam to build that list that I mentioned earlier. He also used this time to shoot at jets that were inspecting the no fly zones. He used oil money to fund Palestinian suicide bombers and line the pockets of UN officials. After realizing that George Bush was no Bill Clinton, he then stalled just long enough to hide his weapons in Syria in an attempt to make it appear that he was complying. He assumed that this would buy him enough influence to avert an invasion. Hindsight tells us that he assumed wrong.

Hindsight has also told us about Saddam's plans. It has told us that he was using the oil-for-food scandal to buy influence with the UN. After all of the information we now have regarding this scandal, can we safely say that he was not using his cash to influence the inspectors who were there in early 2003? Hindsight tells us that he was building alliances with Palestinian thugs and the terrorist regime of Syria and using funds from smuggled oil to do so. It tells us that he gave safe haven to terrorists like Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian national who had ties to Al-Qaeda long before the invasion. While I’m at it, I will also mention that hindsight tells us that the AP reported no less than two separate attacks on our troops that included IEDs created from looted chemical weapons in 2003. Hindsight tells us quite a bit about Saddam's regime, maybe the writers for the Huff should subscribe to the History Channel.

So before you accuse Mitt Romney of stepping in shit or living in a mad, make-believe world, you should try this little thing known as research. You should take a look at the timeline. You should take a look at Saddam’s intentions. Failure to do so makes it appear that you support people like Saddam, former terrorist thug.

More on the Huffington Post's Al-Qaeda Connection

It appears that the Huff recently called for the death of American troops in Iraq.

Read More

Huffington Post Continues its Support for Terrorists

by The New Pundit

The Huffington post jumped all over the JFK plot. They jumped all over it by explaining to us that it was all bull.

Why Wasn't the Headline "Bombers Not Smart Enough to Bomb JFK"?

Why didn't the headlines read "Bombers Not Smart Enough to Bomb JFK" or "Plot to Blow-up JFK Unfeasible"? No, as is often the case in our post-9/11 paranoid universe, media hype and authoritarian fear-mongering conspire to freak us out.

In this post, Anthony Kaufman spouts the propaganda that helped cause 9-11. He showed his support for the destruction of the United States by telling us that the people planning this plot would have never been able to actually carry it out. He also yapped on about how the attacks coincidentally come during low poll numbers for the Bush administration. He pretends that Bush needs high poll numbers for some reason.

In How to Foil a Terrorist Plot in Seven Simple Steps, al-qaeda propagandist Nora Ephron tells us that the FBI fakes these plots by paying convicted felons to set people up.

Let me be very blunt here. These two people are supporters of the propaganda being used against this country by the likes of al-qaeda and other terrorist organizations. There is no sugar coating. They are trying to destroy this country.

The FBI, probably using tactics that the left has deemed unconstitutional, discovered and thwarted a plot that could have killed thousands. To pass off the people who planned this as not being smart enough is propaganda. We know they weren’t smart enough, which is why they were caught. We catch people by being smarter than they are. Claiming that this has something to do with the poll numbers of a man who will never seek public office again is terrorist propaganda. I don’t call it propaganda lightly. I do so after carefully looking for any other reason for the accusation, and cannot find one. Bush doesn’t care about his popularity right now, if you don’t believe me, ask those who voted for him what they think about immigration reform. Since there is no real logical reason for claiming that this has anything to do with popularity, we are left with two options. Either Anthony Kaufman is so stupid that he can barely breathe, or he is supporting terrorist propaganda. Since he was apparently able to think this story up and type it, he can’t be that stupid. This leaves us with the second option.

The same goes for Nora’s article. She attempts to make the case that the FBI finds convicted criminals, and pays them a big pile of cash to go out and talk others into a terrorist plot so that they can then arrest the poor souls and look like heroes. Again, this is blatant stupidity, or terrorist propaganda. She can type, so she can’t be stupid enough to believe her own words. It simply isn’t possible. No one who believes this kind of nonsense could possibly remember to breathe. Their brains wouldn’t be able to both breathe and type at the same time.

Imagine trying to run Windows XP and the latest version of AOL with a 10 year old computer. You would have a slow processor with 64k of RAM. Windows XP probably wouldn’t even start up, but if it did, AOL would cause the computer to freeze up because both programs running at the same time would be too much for the slow processor and low RAM. This is what would happen if people stupid enough to write this stuff actually believed what they were saying. The act of breathing while typing big words would cause one of those “not responding” messages you get when your computer decides to shut down.

I don’t know what it is that makes people decide to support terrorist propaganda that is used against their own country. It makes no sense at all. Interestingly, both of these propagandists live in New York, which so far has been the biggest bulls-eye for radical Islamic thugs. I’m curious; do they have a death wish? Maybe they have the inside scoop as to when these attacks will actually occur so that they can be sure to not be around? I mean, if they wanted to kill themselves, they could easily go the route of the bomb-strapped-to-the-chest jihads. Or maybe they know that their propaganda is even more important to the cause than dying.

Then again, maybe my assumptions about their brains shutting down are inaccurate. Maybe they are really just that stupid.